Op-Ed: Washington must match Kansas: Moran, Marshall can deliver clarity on crypto

Craig Bowser • June 23, 2026

Kansas families didn't ask to become the front lines of the digital currency debate. But when crypto kiosks started showing up in gas stations and grocery stores across our state, and scammers started using them to drain the savings of our seniors, we had no choice but to act.

 

Over the past two years, I worked to build a Kansas framework that takes digital assets seriously: both the genuine promise they hold and the very real dangers they pose when left ungoverned.

 

Earlier this year, Kansas passed House Bill 2591, the Virtual Currency Kiosk Consumer Protection Act, which was signed into law this spring. That legislation requires kiosk operators to register with the state, use blockchain analytics software to screen for wallets tied to known fraud, display clear on-screen warnings before any transaction, cap fees, and ensure live customer service is always available. It passed unanimously. Not a single Kansas legislator voted against protecting our families.

 

As I said when we moved this legislation forward: Kansas families and seniors deserve consistent protections, whether a transaction happens in Topeka or through a server on the other side of the world. Kansas is moving to strengthen its safeguards. Now Washington must do the same and ensure that innovation does not come at the cost of security.

 

That moment has arrived. The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, or the Clarity Act, is now before the United States Senate, having passed the House last July with a commanding bipartisan vote of 294 to 134 and cleared the Senate Banking Committee this May. Kansas's two U.S. Senators, Jerry Moran and Roger Marshall, have the standing, the credibility, and the duty to help carry it across the finish line.

 

For years, digital asset markets have operated in a regulatory no-man's land, with inconsistent rules and regulatory gaps. This ambiguity does not protected consumers and allows criminals to operate. The Clarity Act ends that confusion.

 

The bill draws clear jurisdictional lines and creates a modern enforcement framework that prioritizes fraud prevention, accountability, and coordination between state and federal authorities. It is designed, in the Senate Banking Committee's own words, to "prevent a future FTX collapse," the kind of catastrophic fraud that wiped out billions in ordinary Americans' savings. These are exactly the kinds of guardrails Kansas has been building at the state level. Washington should be doing the same.

 

State-by-state protections are not a substitute for a national framework. A scammer who uses a crypto kiosk in Wichita can route funds through a dozen foreign servers before the transaction settles. That is not a problem Kansas alone can solve.

 

For years, unregulated crypto platforms have competed against community banks without carrying deposit insurance requirements, capital mandates, or the full weight of federal banking regulation. The Clarity Act begins to level that playing field by bringing digital asset intermediaries under comparable federal oversight. Even more importantly, it gives community banks a defined regulatory lane to participate in the digital asset economy themselves, rather than watching from the sidelines as megabanks build out their own tokenized infrastructure. The Independent Community Bankers of America called the bill's committee passage "an important step" toward protecting Main Street community lending. Without clear rules, Kansas community banks face the worst of both worlds. The Clarity Act changes that.

 

Kansas acted. We did it with broad bipartisan support and the backing of AARP Kansas, the Kansas Bankers Association, and the Credit Union Association. Senator Moran has spent decades fighting for Kansas's rural communities and small businesses, the same Kansans most likely to be targeted by crypto fraud. Senator Marshall has consistently focused on cutting through government dysfunction to let markets work. But markets only work when rules apply equally to everyone. It is time to protect Kansans.

By Craig Bowser March 12, 2026
In my rural district, which covers northeast Kansas, families look out for one another and protect their kids at all costs. In our small towns, Kansans trust that public schools will not open their doors to child predators, banks will not make sharky loans to children, and corner stores will not sell unaccompanied minors alcohol, tobacco, or other age-restricted products. Unfortunately, Kansas parents cannot count on the same protections for their kids online. Today’s digital world works less like a small town and more like the Wild West. The fabric of trust, accountability, and shared values that ties Kansans together is nowhere to be found on our kids’ phones and tablets – least of all on the app store marketplaces that deliver millions of poorly regulated platforms straight to our kids’ home screens. In just a few taps, app stores allow kids to download improperly age-rated platforms, including social media apps, violent video games, AI chatbots, and anonymous messaging tools, all of which can become breeding grounds for blackmailers and child predators. When kids agree to download or purchase these platforms, they also consent to opaque terms of service conditions that allow developers to comb through their contacts, search history, and camera roll and constitute binding contracts. At no point in the process is a parent notified or asked to consent. As a father, I find this lack of default, automatic protection entirely unacceptable. Parents deserve better tools to supervise kids online. And children deserve stronger safeguards. That is why I support Senate Bill 372 , the App Store Accountability Act. Senate Bill 372 would restore trust, order, and transparency to the app store overnight. Just like teachers require a signed permission slip for a student to participate in a field trip, Senate Bill 372 would require informed parental consent for all minors’ app downloads and purchases. This precautionary step has potential to stop harm in its tracks, empowering parents to block kids’ access to risky apps that open the door to cyberbullying, mature content, sextortion, and more before they are ever installed. How it works in practice is simple. Senate Bill 372 would require app stores to use their existing age-verification mechanisms as the foundation for obtaining parental approval. During account set-up, app stores would link minor and parent accounts, providing parents with a secure and familiar system to manage the platforms available on their kids’ devices without needing to repeatedly share age information on an app-by-app basis. Kansans agree this bill is necessary. Recent polling shows overwhelming bipartisan support for Senate Bill 372’s core premise: 81% of Kansans, including 82% of parents, support requiring app stores to verify users’ ages and obtain parental consent before minors can download apps. The reason behind this near-unanimous support is simple. App stores serve as the primary gateways to the digital world, and parents agree that is where meaningful safeguards must begin. Parental consent, truth in advertising, contracting fairness, and age-gating are common-sense safety guardrails that ought to be built-in to app stores, just as they are in the real world. Kansas parents are tired of waiting for Washington to deliver the digital protections our kids urgently need. It’s time we follow in the footsteps of Utah, Texas, Louisiana, and Alabama and pass the App Store Accountability Act in Topeka. I was proud to vote with my Senate colleagues to advance Senate Bill 372 to the Kansas House of Representatives where it now awaits a hearing in the Committee on Federal and State Affairs. I urge my fellow state lawmakers to act without delay and pass this bill to protect future generations from exploitation and the harms of an unaccountable digital marketplace.
By Zoran Spirkovski January 23, 2026
Kansas Senator Craig Bowser introduced legislation on Jan. 21 that would create a state Bitcoin reserve through unclaimed digital assets. The bill explicitly shields Bitcoin from transfer to the state's general fund. It takes a custody-focused approach rather than authorizing direct cryptocurrency purchases with state funds. Senate Bill 352 establishes a "Bitcoin and digital assets reserve fund" administered by the Kansas State Treasurer, according to the official bill text. The legislation amends Kansas unclaimed property statutes to include digital assets, with a three-year abandonment period before the state can claim dormant cryptocurrency holdings. The bill's most distinctive provision creates a two-tier treatment for digital assets. Non-Bitcoin digital assets would see 10% of each deposit credited to the state general fund. Bitcoin receives explicit protection under Section 1(b), which states the treasurer "shall not deposit bitcoin in the state general fund." Custody Framework and Staking Provisions Digital assets reported as abandoned must be delivered to a qualified custodian within 30 days. The bill defines qualified custodians as entities licensed to sell digital assets and offer custody services in Kansas. These include chartered banks and trust companies. The legislation permits custodians to stake digital assets and receive airdrops.  Staking means earning rewards by locking up crypto to secure a blockchain network, while airdrops are free token distributions. After three years, these proceeds transfer to the reserve fund if the property remains unclaimed. State Reserve Movement Context Kansas joins a growing number of states pursuing Bitcoin reserves. President Trump signed an executive order in March 2025 establishing a federal Strategic Bitcoin Reserve . The federal reserve has since expanded to over 326,000 BTC following additional seizures. The Kansas approach differs significantly from Texas, which became the first state to make a direct Bitcoin purchase on Nov. 20, 2025. Texas acquired $5 million in Bitcoin through BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin Trust at $91,336 per coin under its Strategic Bitcoin Reserve program. SB 352 was referred to committee on Jan. 22. The unclaimed property approach follows a similar structure to Arizona's HB 2749, signed into law in May 2025. Three states have enacted reserve legislation, with 17 additional states considering similar measures. Bowser previously sponsored SB 34 in January 2025 to allow the Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) to invest in Bitcoin ETFs, but the bill remains in committee with no further action.